Secure America Now is a community of over 4 million patriots dedicated to defending American security, values, and freedoms. Through bold advocacy and grassroots action, we hold leaders accountable and fight for a safer, stronger nation.
OUR PRIORITIES
Secure America Now's mission is to bring critical national security threats to the forefront of the American debate.
Defeating Ideological Infiltration of the West
Exposing Foreign Influence in American Institutions
Defending National Sovereignty from Sharia-Based Policy
Whatever your vision for America, we all need security and strength to protect it. That’s what Secure America Now fights for. We partner with patriotic Americans like you to defend our nation, safeguard our freedoms, and hold radical liberal politicians accountable—because a strong America is a safe America.
Go to Action Center
→
.png)
.png)
→Every piece of merch bought from the official SAN store fuels our critical mission to protect our homeland and preserve common-sense national security. When you wear Secure America Now gear, you aren't just making a statement; you are joining a frontline movement of thousands of Americans demanding we maintain borders, put an end to sanctuary cities, and take a clear, unyielding stance against foreign nuclear threats.
SECURE OUR FUTURE TOGETHER.avif)
.avif)
- Enter Store Here
Add your name to show that Americans stand firmly with Israel and support decisive action against Iran’s threats. We’re working to ensure this message reaches leaders, communities, and decision-makers nationwide. Your support helps expand that impact.
Stay informed on national security with expert analysis and
hard-hitting discussions on the Code Red Podcast.
%201.avif)
On Code Red, Secure America Now’s President, Allen Roth, talks to experts about critical national security threats and their impact on America’s safety.
.avif)
October 7, 2026
.png)
Three years ago today, Hamas launched a coordinated, barbaric terrorist assault against Israel. Thousands of radical Islamist militants breached border defenses, slaughtered innocent civilians in their homes, and turned a music festival into a site of unimaginable violence.
Yet a dangerous misconception persists in public discourse: the belief that October 7 was strictly a distant, foreign conflict.
It was not. October 7 was a direct attack on American citizens, American interests, and the core foundation of our national security. Three years later, as we remember the victims, we must remain clear-eyed about how the actions of Hamas directly connect to the safety of the American homeland.
When Hamas terrorists swept through southern Israel, they targeted civilians without regard to nationality. Among the over 1,200 people murdered and more than 240 kidnapped were dozens of dual U.S.-Israeli citizens. American families were shattered in an instant:
These Americans were not accidental collateral damage. They were targeted, tortured, and taken by a designated foreign terrorist organization. Their targeting directly ties the violence of Hamas to American soil and reminds us that our citizens remain at risk whenever radical Islamist terrorism is allowed to operate unhindered.
At SAN, our mission rests on an undeniable principle: America's national security does not stop at our borders, and terrorist threats cannot be ignored simply because they originate overseas.
The threat Hamas poses to U.S. security is three-fold:
Standing firmly with Israel to dismantle Hamas is not merely foreign diplomacy; it is a strategic necessity for American homeland security. Confronting Hamas, cutting off its financial networks, and holding its leaders accountable, fully aligned with SAN's mission, is essential to ensuring that radical Islamist terrorism does not strike our own communities next.
October 7 was an attack on Israel, on American citizens, and on the security of the free world.
Never forget October 7. Never ignore the threat.
September 25, 2026
.png)
On September 2, 2026, a driver fleeing an ICE vehicle stop in North Brunswick, New Jersey, ran a red light and crashed into a car driven by Dr. Penelope Cohen. She suffered a leg injury and was taken to the hospital. ICE apprehended the driver after the crash.
The driver is responsible for fleeing and causing the collision. The incident also raises a separate public safety question: Should New Jersey limit when state and local police can cooperate with ICE?
New Jersey’s Immigrant Trust Directive limits the voluntary assistance state and local law enforcement can provide to federal immigration authorities, including ICE. It allows cooperation in specified circumstances. Governor Mikie Sherrill signed legislation codifying the directive on March 25, 2026.
The crash does not establish that the directive caused the driver to flee or prevented police from responding. But it shows how quickly fleeing an immigration enforcement stop can endanger someone else. New Jersey should review whether its restrictions make it harder for law enforcement agencies to work together when public safety is at stake.
Officers enforcing immigration law should be able to count on meaningful cooperation from state and local authorities. New Jersey lawmakers should reconsider restrictions that stand in the way of that cooperation.
Tell your lawmakers: Support ICE. End sanctuary policies. Put public safety first.
September 22, 2026
Tucker Carlson recently sent shockwaves through the political landscape by offering a stunning defense of Michigan’s progressive Democratic Senate nominee, Abdul El-Sayed.
Carlson went so far as to call El-Sayed’s agenda “literally Trumpian,” declared he wouldn’t vote for Republican Mike Rogers “at gunpoint,” and even ran interference for El-Sayed’s highly controversial past comments regarding America’s response to 9/11.
But while media pundits chase clicks and contrarian headlines, we must remain focused on the facts.
When you strip away the television spin and examine Abdul El-Sayed’s documented record, a deeply concerning picture emerges. It is a record characterized by proximity to radical networks and organizations that have historically sought to infiltrate and influence American institutions.
The University of Michigan Muslim Students Association (MSA)
Abdul El-Sayed’s political foundation was built during his time as a student leader.
As an undergraduate, he served as the Vice President of the University of Michigan’s Muslim Students Association (MSA).
This is not simply a collegiate social club. The national MSA was notoriously founded in the 1960s by members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Under El-Sayed’s leadership in 2007, the UM chapter made headlines when he helped lead a protest and student walkout against a panel of self-described "ex-terrorists" who had abandoned Islamic extremism and converted to Christianity.
Championing protests against individuals who explicitly denounced radical Islamist violence raises serious questions about the ideological environment El-Sayed helped foster during his tenure.
The scrutiny extends far beyond college protests.
For years, organizations and individuals within El-Sayed’s orbit have faced allegations concerning links to Muslim Brotherhood-connected networks.
It is a matter of public record that El-Sayed's familial and political networks intersect with prominent domestic Islamic organizations, such as the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), groups that have historically faced intense federal scrutiny over their origins and alleged ties to the broader Muslim Brotherhood network in America.
The Muslim Brotherhood’s own documented explanatory memorandums have historically described their work in America as a "civilization-jihadist process" aimed at influencing institutions from within.
When a candidate seeking one of the highest offices in the land has a record of leadership and association with organizations linked to this network, Americans have a duty to ask hard questions.
This is not a debate about foreign policy or the Middle East. This is entirely about the integrity of America’s domestic institutions.
When political figures like Tucker Carlson offer unearned praise to candidates like El-Sayed, they legitimize the very networks that conservative and security-minded Americans have spent decades trying to expose.
We cannot afford to have a blind spot when it comes to the ideological company a candidate keeps. The people, networks, and organizations that elevate a politician ultimately guide their hand once they achieve power.
America’s institutions should have no foothold for radical Islamist influence.
Follow the connections. Know who is seeking power.
Tucker Carlson praised Michigan candidate Abdul El-Sayed, describing his agenda as "literally Trumpian," declaring he would not vote for Republican Mike Rogers "at gunpoint," and defending El-Sayed’s past controversial comments about America's response to 9/11.
El-Sayed served as Vice President of the University of Michigan Muslim Students Association.
In 2007, under his leadership, the chapter led protests and student walkouts against speakers who had publicly denounced Islamic extremism.
The National Muslim Students Association was established in the 1960s by members of the Muslim Brotherhood to build ideological presence and influence across American college campuses.
El-Sayed’s campaign and professional networks overlap with organizations such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), both of which have faced historical scrutiny regarding ties to Muslim Brotherhood networks.
Islam is a religious faith protected under the First Amendment.
Radical Islamist ideology is a political movement that uses religious framework to subvert democratic institutions from within.
No. This analysis strictly addresses domestic institutional integrity, civic security, and preventing radical ideological networks from acquiring political power inside American institutions.
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
